|
|
||
Pond, 2Posted by GJC (Kyoto (京都), Japan) on 3 September 2009 in Abstract & Conceptual. This is part of a short series of nine photos, showing different moods of a pond in evening. There is no post-processing done on these images except to amplify the contrast a little. Otherwise it was all done by playing with the WB settings. Yesterday's image inspired a wonderful conversation about posting suggestions for improvement on other people's images. Take a look at the comments from yesterday and tell me what you think........
Comments (21)
ordinaryimages from Kentucky Bluegrass, United StatesSplendid. fwiw I consider a DSLR a computer so I see little difference in playing the WB or adjusting it in software. A RAW file doesn't feel anything like a chrome to me. 3 Sep 2009 6:34am @ordinaryimages: Fully agreed. I only make the point because so many people ask. akarui from Kagoshima, JapanThe reflections in the water is a subject that I enjoy, there are so different... 3 Sep 2009 7:58am Veronique from Sarrouilles, FranceI find it intersting to have the vision of others on my pictures but it's seldom the case. As pointed out by Akarui "beautiful" is the norm if you want to have a few visitors, even if sometimes "beautiful" IS the only appreciation you can give. 3 Sep 2009 8:35am Veronique from Sarrouilles, Franceand for this picture...I find it a bit to flashy; yesterday's my favorite 3 Sep 2009 8:38am cat from Tel Aviv, IsraelThis is an absolutely beautiful photograph, GJC - it's very Impressionistic. Reminds me of Monet's work with water and light. About so-called "critique" - I've had several people opine that my photo is "wrong" and how to "improve". I understand that some people are looking to "improve" through feedback - but how can I follow the advice of a person on the internet "critiquing" my photo unless (a) I am specifically trying to emulate their work or (b) I ask advice about a certain technique. The photograph is my artistic expression - if you want to talk about your reaction to it and why, that's great. But saying it's "too dark" or "it's not processed" are meaningless statements, and not advice. There was an experiment done on Flickr. Someone posted a photograph by a well-known artist. People helpfully critiqued that it was "not in focus", "depressing subject", "what about HDR?" etc etc. 3 Sep 2009 1:29pm @cat: Thanks for the thoughtful comment. In fact, Monet was exactly what I had in mind when I took this one! rian from mobile, United Statesbeen a long time since i last passed by here, i just saw your comment on daina's blog so i wondered what it was all about.. :) anyhoo, you're doing a pretty good job here.. yesterday's post was beautiful IMO.. :) 3 Sep 2009 2:12pm Howard F. from South Pasadena, Calif., United StatesThis is especially painterly, just the color alone makes me think of the vibrant hues on a paint palette, glossy and shiny. Nice shot. 3 Sep 2009 4:58pm daina from New York, United StatesWith all the heated discussion I almost neglected to say how wonderful I find this series. They are painterly without imitating painting i.e. all sorts of post processing and textures. They are wonderful photographs! 3 Sep 2009 10:03pm Earnest from Oklahoma, United StatesThe previous shot was good but this one is exceptional! 4 Sep 2009 6:08pm lux from Munich, GermanyAmazing foto, which reminds me of an art painting. I like the explosion of colours here! 4 Sep 2009 6:44pm grant from kansas city, United Statesthis is amazing. (but i don't know what "wb settings" are.) 5 Sep 2009 1:22am Tracy from La Selva Beach, United StatesThis is wonderful to me! I love the Monet-like quality you've created. I think this series has already done wonderful things for your photography! 5 Sep 2009 5:24am Anita from West Nottingham, United StatesPersonally, I appreciate thoughtful comments and critiques, but seldom get them. I suppose there is always the danger of uninformed critiques, but, I will likely be able to detect these. Wonderful image! It totters on the edge of being too bright for me. The colors are fabulous, as is the limited range of colors. Would be nice to know whic WB you were using for each. 15 Sep 2009 12:20pm |
Nikon D300 |